|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1983-10-04
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
465 U.S. 668
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1984-03-05
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Daniel_J._Lynch
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
gptkb:Harry_Blackmun
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Daniel_J._Lynch,_Mayor_of_Pawtucket,_et_al._v._Daniel_Donnelly,_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
A city’s inclusion of a nativity scene in its Christmas display does not violate the Establishment Clause.
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Establishment_Clause
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Pawtucket,_Rhode_Island
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_H._Rehnquist
gptkb:Lewis_F._Powell,_Jr.
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:Daniel_Donnelly
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
cases involving religious displays on public property
|
|
gptkbp:reargued
|
no
|
|
gptkbp:relatedConcept
|
separation of church and state
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Lemon_v._Kurtzman
gptkb:County_of_Allegheny_v._ACLU
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:nativity_scene
holiday displays
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_constitutional_law
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Lynch v. Donnelly
|