|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Maryland_v._King
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:569_U.S._435
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 3, 2013
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
12-207
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
DNA collection from arrestees is constitutional under the Fourth Amendment
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
King v. Maryland (2013)
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Alonzo_Jay_King,_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
law enforcement DNA collection practices
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_Maryland
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
criminal procedure
search and seizure
DNA sampling
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Alonzo_Jay_King,_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|