Statements (22)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
550 U.S. 398
numerous subsequent patent law cases |
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
April 30, 2007
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decision |
unanimous
|
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
04-1350
|
| gptkbp:effect |
broadened the standard for obviousness in patent law
|
| gptkbp:fullName |
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. et al.
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
The TSM (teaching-suggestion-motivation) test for obviousness is not the only test for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
KSR v. Teleflex, Inc.
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:US_patent
obviousness |
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
|
| gptkbp:overruledTest |
teaching-suggestion-motivation test
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
KSR International Co.
|
| gptkbp:precededBy |
Federal Circuit decision in Teleflex, Inc. v. KSR International Co.
|
| gptkbp:relatedStatute |
gptkb:35_U.S.C._§_103
|
| gptkbp:response |
Teleflex, Inc.
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:KSR
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|