|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
November 28, 2006
|
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
overturned lower court ruling
expanded definition of obviousness
|
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
landmark patent case
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
gptkb:intellectual_property
|
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
encouraged innovation
influenced future patent litigation
influenced international patent law discussions
redefined obviousness standard
influenced patent policy discussions
affected patent application process
affected patent enforcement strategies
affected patent litigation outcomes
affected the role of the USPTO
changed how obviousness is evaluated
changed patent examination guidelines
changed the landscape of patent law
increased scrutiny of patent claims
influenced academic discussions on patent law
influenced patent attorney practices
influenced patent reform efforts
influenced patent strategy for companies
promoted clearer patent standards
reduced patent litigation costs
shaped future patent law cases
shaped the future of patent litigation
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 30, 2007
|
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion
|
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_David_Souter
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
05-1515
04-1350
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
patent law
patent law standards
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
550 U. S. 398
|
|
gptkbp:judges
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction
|
federal
|
|
gptkbp:legal_context
|
U. S. patent law
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
gptkb:intellectual_property
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
patent obviousness
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
non-obviousness standard
|
|
gptkbp:modern_relevance
|
patentability criteria
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
reversed and remanded
|
|
gptkbp:party
|
gptkb:KSR_International_Co.
gptkb:Teleflex_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Hotchkiss_v._Greenwood
gptkb:In_re_Dembiczak
gptkb:Graham_v._John_Deere_Co.
gptkb:In_re_Kahn
gptkb:In_re_Bilski
KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. (2006)
|
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:In_re_Dembiczak
gptkb:Teleflex_Inc._v._KSR_International_Co.
gptkb:In_re_Baird
gptkb:In_re_Kubin
gptkb:In_re_Oetiker
gptkb:In_re_Kahn
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
redefined obviousness standard
influenced patent examination process
|
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2006
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit
gptkb:United_States_v._Adams
gptkb:Federal_Circuit
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|