Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
73-1
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
73-1
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
383 U.S. 1
383 U.S. 1 (1974) |
| gptkbp:controversy |
November 19, 1973
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
examined patent claims influenced patent litigation non-obviousness is a requirement patent claims were invalid patent was not valid |
| gptkbp:date |
January 21, 1974
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
1974 |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
patent law doctrine
|
| gptkbp:duration |
1 hour
|
| gptkbp:field |
intellectual property
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appealed from lower court
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
dispute over patent rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Graham v. John Deere Co.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
patent examination process
influenced patent policy |
| gptkbp:influenced |
previous patent cases
|
| gptkbp:inventorResidence |
higher standards for patentability
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Graham_and_John_Deere_Company
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
Supreme_Court_review |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
non-obviousness
patent validity |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
non-obviousness requirement
Graham's_attorney |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
prior art
landmark patent case U.S._patent_system |
| gptkbp:legislation |
35 U.S.C. § 103
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
383 U.S. 1 (1974)
affects patent enforcement impact on patent applications patent reform discussions shaped patent law interpretation |
| gptkbp:outcome |
reversed and remanded
invalidated patent set precedent for patent law |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
patent law
patent non-obviousness standard |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:KSR_International_Co._v._Teleflex_Inc.
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established the non-obviousness standard
|
| gptkbp:technology |
agricultural machinery
|