Statements (50)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:applicationNumber |
73-1
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
73-1
|
gptkbp:citedBy |
383 U.S. 1
383 U.S. 1 (1974) |
gptkbp:controversy |
November 19, 1973
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
examined patent claims influenced patent litigation non-obviousness is a requirement patent claims were invalid patent was not valid |
gptkbp:date |
January 21, 1974
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
1974 |
gptkbp:doctrine |
patent law doctrine
|
gptkbp:duration |
1 hour
|
gptkbp:field |
intellectual property
|
gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appealed from lower court
|
gptkbp:homeGround |
dispute over patent rights
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Graham v. John Deere Co.
|
gptkbp:impact |
patent examination process
influenced patent policy |
gptkbp:influenced |
previous patent cases
|
gptkbp:inventorResidence |
higher standards for patentability
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Graham_and_John_Deere_Company
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
Supreme_Court_review |
gptkbp:legal_principle |
non-obviousness
patent validity |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
non-obviousness requirement
Graham's_attorney |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
prior art
landmark patent case U.S._patent_system |
gptkbp:legislation |
35 U.S.C. § 103
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
383 U.S. 1 (1974)
affects patent enforcement impact on patent applications patent reform discussions shaped patent law interpretation |
gptkbp:outcome |
reversed and remanded
invalidated patent set precedent for patent law |
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Potter_Stewart
|
gptkbp:precedent |
patent law
patent non-obviousness standard |
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:KSR_International_Co._v._Teleflex_Inc.
|
gptkbp:significance |
established the non-obviousness standard
|
gptkbp:technology |
agricultural machinery
|