Jacob Abrams et al. v. United States

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:Abrams_v._United_States
gptkbp:arguedDate	October 21, 1919
gptkbp:charge	conspiring to violate the Espionage Act inciting resistance to the war effort urging curtailment of production of war materials
gptkbp:citation	250 U.S. 616 (1919)
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	November 10, 1919
gptkbp:defendant	gptkb:Hyman_Lachowsky gptkb:Jacob_Abrams gptkb:Jacob_Schwartz gptkb:Mollie_Steimer gptkb:Samuel_Lipman
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Louis_Brandeis gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
gptkbp:docketNumber	gptkb:250_U.S._616
gptkbp:heldBy	The Espionage Act of 1917, as amended by the Sedition Act of 1918, did not violate the First Amendment when applied to speech intended to hinder the war effort.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Jacob Abrams et al. v. United States
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_John_Hessin_Clarke
gptkbp:notableFor	Holmes' dissent introducing the 'marketplace of ideas' concept
gptkbp:predecessor	First Amendment jurisprudence
gptkbp:relatedLegislation	gptkb:Espionage_Act_of_1917 gptkb:Sedition_Act_of_1918
gptkbp:result	convictions affirmed
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:World_War_I gptkb:First_Amendment freedom of speech
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Abrams_v._United_States
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6