Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Company
GPTKB entity
Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:court_cases
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed in legal textbooks
implications for state versus federal authority relevant to discussions on regulatory agencies |
| gptkbp:case_legal_discussion |
discussed in legal forums
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_documentation |
documented in case law collections
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_relevance |
relevant to current regulatory discussions
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
documented in legal archives
part of a series of cases involving the ICC |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day
influenced public policy on transportation affirmed the authority of the ICC the ICC's authority was upheld the ICC's rate-setting power was confirmed upheld ICC's rate-setting authority |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for the development of administrative law
important for understanding federal regulation |
| gptkbp:case_types |
administrative law case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
implications for future regulatory practices
significant impact on administrative law |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
March 1, 1914 |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
gptkb:No._1
|
| gptkbp:duration |
ongoing relevance in legal studies
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
early 20th century regulation of railroads
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pacific Company
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced future cases on transportation regulation
led to more stringent regulations on railroads |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Southern_Pacific_Company
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Commission |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
234 U. S. 1
|
| gptkbp:judged_by |
affirmed
judgment delivered by the Supreme Court |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
review of administrative agency decisions
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
context of early 20th century regulatory environment
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
part of the legal framework for transportation regulation
part of the legal framework for federal regulation of commerce. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
regulation of railroad rates
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
expanded federal regulatory power
upheld the ICC's regulatory authority |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
federal authority over interstate commerce
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
analyzed in legal literature
attorneys for Southern Pacific Company attorneys for the Interstate Commerce Commission |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Act
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Interstate Commerce Commission
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established legal precedent for future cases
subsequent transportation regulations set a precedent for future ICC cases |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific Railroad Company |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
discussed in law reviews
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established precedent for federal regulation of interstate commerce
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Commission_v._Chicago,_Rock_Island_and_Pacific_Railway_Company
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|