|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:court_cases
|
|
gptkbp:case_types
|
administrative law case
|
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:docket_number
|
gptkb:No._1
|
|
gptkbp:effective_date
|
gptkb:1914
|
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
early 20th century regulation
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company
|
|
gptkbp:impact
|
influenced future transportation regulations
|
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:Chicago,_Rock_Island_and_Pacific_Railway_Company
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Commission
|
|
gptkbp:is_cited_in
|
234 U. S. 1
|
|
gptkbp:judged_by
|
in favor of ICC
|
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day
|
|
gptkbp:legal_framework
|
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Act
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
regulation of interstate commerce
|
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
federal oversight of railroads
|
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
attorneys for Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company
attorneys for ICC
|
|
gptkbp:modern_relevance
|
transportation law
|
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
affirmed the authority of the ICC
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
subsequent ICC cases
|
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Commission_v._Baltimore_&_Ohio_Railroad_Company
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Commission_v._Southern_Pacific_Company
|
|
gptkbp:significance
|
established precedent for federal regulation of railroads
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Wabash,_St._Louis_&_Pacific_Railway_Co._v._Illinois
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|