Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
URI: https://gptkb.org/entity/Interstate_Commerce_Commission_v._Chicago%2C_Burlington_%26_Quincy_Railroad
GPTKB entity
Properties (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
No. 1
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
influenced regulatory practices
important for federal regulatory authority shaped future transportation regulations significant for administrative law development significant for federal oversight affirmed_ICC's_rate-setting_authority upheld_ICC's_rate-setting_power established_ICC's_role_in_transportation_regulation |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
administrative law
administrative review case |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
254 U.S. 77
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
upheld_ICC's_findings ruled_in_favor_of_ICC's_authority |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
March 1, 1920 |
| gptkbp:firstClaim |
influenced New Deal policies
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
early 20th century regulatory environment
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
part_of_a_series_of_ICC_cases
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
|
| gptkbp:impact |
railroad industry regulations
increased federal regulation of railroads |
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
earlier_ICC_cases
|
| gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Commission |
| gptkbp:judges |
deferential standard
reinforced federal authority over interstate commerce dissent_by_Justice_James_Clark_McReynolds in_favor_of_ICC majority_opinion_by_Justice_William_Howard_Taft review_of_ICC's_decisions |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
federal law
administrative discretion rate discrimination regulation of railroad rates dispute over freight rates established precedent for administrative law regulatory framework of the time strengthened_ICC's_regulatory_power upheld_ICC's_regulations |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Act
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
landmark case in transportation law
important for administrative agencies |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed_the_authority_of_the_ICC
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Commission |
| gptkbp:precedent |
future regulatory cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad
gptkb:Southern_Railway_Co._v._United_States cases_involving_ICC_authority |
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
transportation law
|
| gptkbp:significance |
established_ICC's_power_to_set_rates
|
| gptkbp:yearEstablished |
March 1, 1920
January 12, 1920 |