United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
GPTKB entity
Properties (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
court case
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
No. 1
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
shaped future regulatory frameworks
railroad's practices were found to violate federal law led to increased federal oversight upheld federal regulations over railroads favorable_to_the_United_States |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
administrative law
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
discussed in legal journals |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appealed from lower court
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced future transportation regulations
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Taft gptkb:Justice_William_R._Day March 2, 1908 |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:U.S._Attorney_General
interstate commerce regulation of interstate commerce 210 U.S. 328 Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad's_counsel upheld_the_authority_of_the_Interstate_Commerce_Commission |
| gptkbp:notableEvent |
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Act
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
resolved
available in legal archives unanimous decision by the court dissenting opinion by Justice Day examined the scope of federal authority important for federal regulatory power still cited in modern regulatory discussions majority_opinion_written_by_Justice_Holmes |
| gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
|
| gptkbp:politicalAffiliation |
gptkb:United_States
gptkb:Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad |
| gptkbp:precedent |
federal authority over state regulations
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Interstate_Commerce_Commission_v._Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad
context of early 20th-century regulation emerged during the Progressive Era set limits on state power over interstate commerce |
| gptkbp:significance |
established precedent for federal regulation of railroads
|
| gptkbp:team |
established standards for future cases
influenced later cases on commerce regulation part of the evolution of administrative law analyzed the balance of power between state and federal governments affirmed_the_ICC's_authority critical_for_understanding_federalism_in_the_U.S. strengthened_the_role_of_the_ICC |
| gptkbp:year |
1908
|