Statements (100)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Melville_Fuller
|
| gptkbp:advocates_for |
appeal denied
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:Injunction_against_the_American_Railway_Union
gptkb:No._1 civil case Contempt of court |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Increased federal intervention in labor disputes
|
| gptkbp:context |
gptkb:American_Railway_Union_strike
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
gptkb:Chicago,_Illinois Strengthened federal judicial power. |
| gptkbp:date |
April 1895
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:duration |
several months
|
| gptkbp:effective_date |
June 1895
|
| gptkbp:has_impact_on |
Union rights
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Gilded Age labor relations
Labor movement in the 1890s |
| gptkbp:historical_event |
gptkb:Pullman_Strike_of_1894
|
| gptkbp:historical_figure |
gptkb:Eugene_V._Debs
gptkb:President_Grover_Cleveland |
| gptkbp:historical_impact |
Set precedent for federal intervention
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
symbol of labor rights struggles
Influenced future labor relations. |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
In re Debs
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced future labor laws
Labor law in the United States labor movement in the United States |
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
gptkb:Sherman_Antitrust_Act
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
158 U. S. 564
|
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Eugene_V._Debs
gptkb:American_Railway_Union |
| gptkbp:judging_criteria |
gptkb:Affirmed
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:Justice_David_J._Brewer
gptkb:battle constitutional review reviewed by the Supreme Court Affirmed lower court's decision. |
| gptkbp:legacy |
Influenced labor rights movements.
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Federal courts
federal courts Labor disputes federal labor law freedom of speech limitations Reinforced federal power Debs' conviction upheld industrial relations in the U. S. influenced judicial attitudes towards labor. injunction against a strike Injunctions in labor disputes Late 19th-century labor unrest. Long-term effects on labor law. Set limits on strike actions. |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Clarence_Darrow
attorney Clarence Darrow |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Clayton_Antitrust_Act
gptkb:Anti-Injunction_Act |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:NLRB_v._Jones_&_Laughlin_Steel_Corp.
gptkb:Lochner_v._New_York gptkb:United_States_v._Shipp |
| gptkbp:notable_figures |
gptkb:Eugene_V._Debs
|
| gptkbp:notable_winners |
Debs sentenced to six months in prison
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:majority_opinion
gptkb:Justice_David_J._Brewer injunction granted affirmed lower court's ruling Still cited in labor law discussions. analyzed in law schools Impact on labor rights Debs was imprisoned Debs' release after serving time labor unions' legal strategies landmark labor case studied in labor law courses upheld the use of injunctions Debs' conviction upheld. Debs' imprisonment Federal government can intervene in strikes Injunction against striking workers Injunction against the strike Key case in U. S. labor history. Labor injunction upheld Labor law evolution in the U. S. Landmark case in labor law Majority opinion favored federal intervention. |
| gptkbp:precedent |
federal injunctions in labor disputes
federal intervention in labor strikes Federal authority in labor relations Federal government's authority in labor disputes |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Mixed
gptkb:Justice_John_Marshall_Harlan gptkb:Justice_Edward_D._White controversial decision |
| gptkbp:related_event |
gptkb:Pullman_Strike_of_1894
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Pullman_Strike
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Expansion of federal power
established federal authority over labor disputes |
| gptkbp:year |
1895
|