Properties (52)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
affirmed lower court's decision
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal law
00-5917 |
gptkbp:citedBy |
536 U.S. 545
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
January 14, 2002 |
gptkbp:firstClaim |
cited in later cases
|
gptkbp:historicalEvent |
appealed from the lower court
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Harris v. United States
|
gptkbp:impact |
reduced expectations of privacy
|
gptkbp:involved |
gptkb:United_States
Harris |
gptkbp:isFiledIn |
amicus curiae briefs
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Souter
gptkb:Justice_Stevens gptkb:Justice_Ginsburg Justice Breyer majority_opinion_authored_by_Justice_Thomas |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
impact on law enforcement practices
search incident to arrest heard on November 27, 2001 totality of circumstances test upheld the search Fourth_Amendment_rights |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
involved a traffic stop
involved drug-related charges clarified search and seizure laws involved the defendant's argument against the search involved a canine unit involved evidence obtained during the search involved police officer's observations involved the circumstances of the arrest involved the defendant's consent involved the defendant's prior record involved the evidence presented at trial involved the implications for future cases involved the legality of the search involved the location of the search involved the nature of the offense involved the officer's training involved the reliability of the canine unit involved the role of the police officer involved the scope of the search involved the timing of the search involved_the_interpretation_of_the_Fourth_Amendment |
gptkbp:outcome |
Court_ruled_in_favor_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
|
gptkbp:precedent |
established standards for search and seizure
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
gptkb:Illinois_v._Gates |