Statements (96)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Continues to be cited in legal arguments.
Implications for personal liberties Ongoing debates on drug legalization Examined limits of federal power. Used in law schools for constitutional law. |
| gptkbp:case_impact_on_legislation |
Influenced future drug-related legislation.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
Originated in California
Part of ongoing drug policy debate. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Affirmed lower court ruling
Subsequent Supreme Court cases Expanded federal power Reinforced federal supremacy Clarified scope of federal authority Affected future legal challenges to drug laws Federal authority upheld Highlighted federalism issues in law Influence on future drug policy Influenced public opinion on drug policy Informed state legislative actions Legal precedent for federal drug enforcement Limited state autonomy in drug policy Set limits on state medical marijuana laws Shaped national drug policy discussions Affirmed lower court ruling. Influenced state medical marijuana laws. Significant for drug policy and federalism. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Impact on state medical marijuana laws
Key case in drug law history. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:Constitution
Constitutional law. |
| gptkbp:championship |
6-3
|
| gptkbp:court |
Rehnquist Court.
|
| gptkbp:date |
November 29, 2004
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 6, 2005 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas State sovereignty. States should have the right to regulate local matters. Federal overreach into state matters. Highlighted state rights issues. Local matters should remain with states. |
| gptkbp:effect_on_states |
States cannot legalize marijuana without federal oversight.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Gonzales v. Raich
|
| gptkbp:impact |
State laws on medical marijuana
States' rights regarding drug laws |
| gptkbp:implications_for_medical_marijuana |
Reinforced federal prohibition
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Gonzales_(Petitioner)
gptkb:Raich gptkb:Gonzales Raich (Respondent) |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
545 U. S. 1 (2005)
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutionality of federal drug laws
Constitutionality of federal law |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Controlled Substances Act
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
2004-2005
Federalism. Federal vs state law conflicts Reaffirmed federal drug enforcement. Strengthened federal regulatory power. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Commerce Clause
Medical marijuana use Commerce Clause powers States' rights vs federal authority Federalism vs. state rights |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Expanded federal jurisdiction.
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Interplay between state and federal law.
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
State medical marijuana laws
|
| gptkbp:majority_opinion_implications |
Set a precedent for federal regulation.
|
| gptkbp:majority_opinion_rationale |
Economic effects justify federal regulation.
|
| gptkbp:majority_opinion_summary |
Congress has the power to regulate local activities that are part of an economic class of activities.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Federal government can regulate marijuana
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Wickard_v._Filburn
Federal regulation of local activities Federal authority over local drug laws Influenced future drug policy cases. |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
6-3 Congress can regulate intrastate activities. Economic activity and regulation. Local use of marijuana affects interstate commerce. |
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Controversial decision
Controversial ruling |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Gonzales_v._Oregon
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade gptkb:United_States_v._Lopez gptkb:Wickard_v._Filburn gptkb:United_States_v._Oakland_Cannabis_Buyers'_Cooperative |
| gptkbp:scholarly_analysis |
Legal implications of the ruling
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause
Interstate Commerce Clause |
| gptkbp:state_law_conflict |
gptkb:California_Compassionate_Use_Act
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|