gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:law
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Ewing_v._California
|
gptkbp:citation
|
538 U.S. 11
|
gptkbp:date
|
March 5, 2003
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_David_Souter
gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
01-6978
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Gary_Ewing_v._California
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
California's three-strikes law sentence of 25 years to life for felony theft did not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Gary Ewing v. California
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
gptkb:Eighth_Amendment
gptkb:Three-strikes_law
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Chief_Justice_William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'Connor
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Gary_Ewing
|
gptkbp:plotSummary
|
The Supreme Court upheld a lengthy prison sentence under California's three-strikes law for a repeat offender convicted of felony theft.
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_California
|
gptkbp:stateLawInvolved
|
gptkb:California_Penal_Code
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
gptkb:crime
sentencing
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Ewing_v._California
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|