|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
538 U.S. 11
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
March 5, 2003
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Stevens
gptkb:Justice_Breyer
gptkb:Justice_Ginsburg
gptkb:Justice_Souter
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
01-6978
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
gptkb:Gary_Ewing_v._California
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
California's three-strikes law sentence of 25 years to life for felony grand theft does not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Ewing v. California
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Kennedy
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Eighth_Amendment
gptkb:Three-strikes_law
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_O'Connor
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Gary_Ewing
|
|
gptkbp:relatedLegislation
|
gptkb:California_Penal_Code_Section_667
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_California
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:constitutional_law
gptkb:crime
sentencing
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|