Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association

GPTKB entity

Statements (47)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:advocacy gptkb:National_Education_Association
gptkbp:caseOutcome Analysis of the tie outcome
Influenced public sector union dynamics
No change in existing law
gptkbp:caseTypes Labor law case
14-915
gptkbp:controversy Compulsory_union_fees_violate_free_speech
gptkbp:court gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
March 29, 2016
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:has_implications_for Influence on future union fee cases
gptkbp:homeGround Involves teachers and union fees
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association
gptkbp:impact Public sector unions
Debate over union membership
gptkbp:influenceOn Potential decrease in union funding
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
Split decision
Judicial review of union practices
gptkbp:legalStatus gptkb:National_Right_to_Work_Legal_Defense_Foundation
Free speech vs. collective bargaining
No definitive ruling due to tie
Public sector collective bargaining
Union fees
Challenge to mandatory union fees
Maintained Abood precedent
First_Amendment_rights
gptkbp:notableEvent California_Educational_Employment_Relations_Act
gptkbp:notableFeature Support from conservative groups
Analysis of union fee legality
Arguments for and against union fees
Criticism from labor advocates
Key case in labor law
Relevant_to_First_Amendment_discussions
Supreme_Court_briefs_and_opinions
gptkbp:outcome Deadlock
gptkbp:politicalParty No majority opinion due to tie
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:Abood_v._Detroit_Board_of_Education
gptkbp:publicAccess Controversial among educators
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Janus_v._AFSCME
gptkb:Harris_v._Quinn
Implications for union funding and membership
gptkbp:respondsTo gptkb:California_Teachers_Association
gptkbp:signatories gptkb:Rebecca_Friedrichs
gptkbp:state gptkb:California
gptkbp:year 2016