Flowers v. Mississippi

GPTKB entity

Statements (57)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:advocacy innocence projects
gptkbp:appeal 2014 conviction
gptkbp:caseOutcome retrial ordered
highlighted systemic issues
reversal and retrial
gptkbp:caseTypes criminal case
17-9572
gptkbp:casualties four people
gptkbp:court guilty verdict
unanimous decision
multiple trials
Curtis_Flowers
Doug_Evans
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 21, 2019
gptkbp:finalDisposal overturned conviction
gptkbp:game_features gptkb:Tupelo,_Mississippi
gptkbp:hasAuthorityOver Supreme_Court_justices
gptkbp:historicalEvent long legal battle
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Flowers v. Mississippi
gptkbp:impact criminal justice reform
gptkbp:involves prosecutorial misconduct
Curtis_Flowers
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh
Justice Clarence Thomas
evidence of bias
influenced jury selection laws
Supreme_Court_review
overturned_by_the_Supreme_Court
reversal_by_the_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:legal_representation public defense
gptkbp:legalStatus due process rights
impact on future cases
discrimination in jury selection
racial discrimination in jury selection
significant legal precedent
affects future jury selection
prosecutor's actions
racial bias in the justice system
Public_Defender's_Office
gptkbp:mediaCoverage extensive coverage
gptkbp:notableFeature court transcripts
landmark case
over two decades
review of jury selection practices
Supreme_Court_ruling
gptkbp:numberOfStudents three
gptkbp:numberOfTeams six
gptkbp:outcome reversal of conviction
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:Batson_v._Kentucky
gptkbp:publicAccess national attention
gptkbp:relatedTo death penalty cases
gptkbp:respondsTo 2016
gptkbp:significance highlighted issues of race in the legal system
gptkbp:state gptkb:Mississippi
gptkb:Mississippi_Supreme_Court