Curtis Giovanni Flowers v. Mississippi

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:law
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs	gptkb:Flowers_v._Mississippi
gptkbp:citation	588 U.S. ___ (2019)
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Alito
gptkbp:date	June 21, 2019
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Thomas gptkb:Justice_Gorsuch
gptkbp:docketNumber	17-9572
gptkbp:heldBy	The trial court committed clear error in concluding that the State’s peremptory strike of a black prospective juror was not motivated in substantial part by discriminatory intent.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Curtis Giovanni Flowers v. Mississippi
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Kavanaugh
gptkbp:numberOfIssues	Whether the prosecution’s use of peremptory challenges to strike black jurors violated the Equal Protection Clause.
gptkbp:originatedIn	gptkb:Mississippi
gptkbp:petitioner	Curtis Giovanni Flowers
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Batson_v._Kentucky
gptkbp:remandedTo	gptkb:Mississippi_Supreme_Court
gptkbp:response	gptkb:State_of_Mississippi
gptkbp:result	Conviction reversed
gptkbp:subject	racial discrimination in jury selection
gptkbp:votingSystem	7-2
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Flowers_v._Mississippi
gptkbp:bfsLayer	8