Statements (67)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Details of the judicial outcome.
Impact on police-citizen interactions. Influenced police training Outcomes affecting police procedures. Police lacked reasonable suspicion Unconstitutional search. Unreasonable search and seizure Court_ruled_against_the_police. |
gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal law
98-1993 Consequences for police conduct. Details_of_the_Supreme_Court's_review. |
gptkbp:citedBy |
529 U.S. 266
|
gptkbp:controversy |
Anonymous tip reliability
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
5-4 ruling |
gptkbp:date |
2000-02-28
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:U.S._Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:filedIn |
2000-01-12
|
gptkbp:hasLegalStatus |
Anonymous tips must be corroborated.
|
gptkbp:historicalEvent |
Appealed_from_Florida_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:homeGround |
Minor was stopped by police.
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Florida v. J.L.
|
gptkbp:impact |
Strengthened Fourth Amendment protections
|
gptkbp:involved |
J.L._(minor),_police_officers
|
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
Reversed and remanded Supreme_Court_review Scalia,_Thomas,_Kennedy,_Rehnquist |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Florida
|
gptkbp:legalStatus |
Constitutional law
2000-01-12 Public defender Reversed lower court decision Reasonable suspicion standard Fourth_Amendment_rights |
gptkbp:notableFeature |
Examined police conduct
Analyzed police authority. Clarified police authority Involved a stop based on an anonymous tip. Judgment reversed. Reaffirmed Fourth Amendment protections. Relevant to civil rights law Significant for civil liberties. |
gptkbp:outcome |
Police action was unconstitutional
|
gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
Ginsburg,_Stevens,_Souter,_Breyer,_O'Connor |
gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
Anonymous tips require corroboration |
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Illinois_v._Wardlow
gptkb:Florida_v._Harris Stop and frisk Guidance for law enforcement Part of constitutional law discussions. |
gptkbp:significance |
Impact on stop-and-frisk policies
|
gptkbp:team |
Implications for law enforcement practices.
Analyzed Fourth Amendment implications. Details of the legal framework established. Details of the legal significance. Discussion on Fourth Amendment rights. Established principles for reasonable suspicion. Framework for evaluating police stops. Important for Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. Set judicial precedent for future cases. Set precedent for future cases. Influenced_future_Fourth_Amendment_cases. |