|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1963-03-25
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
372 U.S. 726
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_John_M._Harlan_II
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1963-04-22
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
85
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
Ferguson, County Attorney of Shawnee County, Kansas v. Skrupa
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
State laws regulating or prohibiting debt adjusting are constitutional under the Due Process Clause.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Ferguson v. Skrupa
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Arthur_Goldberg
gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Earl_Warren
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
gptkb:John_M._Harlan_II
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Due_Process_Clause
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Kansas
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
|
|
gptkbp:overruledBy
|
Lochner v. New York (in part, by reaffirming the end of Lochner era)
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Lochner_era
|
|
gptkbp:result
|
Kansas statute upheld
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
economic regulation
debt adjusting
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Williamson_v._Lee_Optical_(1955)
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|