Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate	1943-12-08 1943-12-07
gptkbp:citation	gptkb:320_U.S._591
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Felix_Frankfurter gptkb:Wiley_Blount_Rutledge gptkb:Robert_H._Jackson
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	1944-02-29
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Owen_J._Roberts gptkb:Frank_Murphy
gptkbp:docketNumber	No. 373
gptkbp:heldBy	The method of calculating rates is not as important as the result; if the total effect of the rate order is just and reasonable, the order is lawful.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.
gptkbp:impact	Established the 'end result' test for rate regulation
gptkbp:legalSubject	natural gas rate regulation public utility regulation
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkbp:overruledBy	gptkb:Smyth_v._Ames
gptkbp:petitioner	gptkb:Federal_Power_Commission
gptkbp:reaffirmedPrecedent	gptkb:Bluefield_Water_Works_&_Improvement_Co._v._Public_Service_Commission_of_West_Virginia
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Smyth_v._Ames gptkb:Bluefield_Water_Works_&_Improvement_Co._v._Public_Service_Commission_of_West_Virginia
gptkbp:response	gptkb:Hope_Natural_Gas_Company
gptkbp:subject	gptkb:Federal_Power_Act gptkb:Natural_Gas_Act
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Federal_Power_Act
gptkbp:bfsLayer	6