Statements (93)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Confederate_States_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:No._1
Civil rights case Civil liberties case No. 186 |
| gptkbp:clinical_trial |
gptkb:Indiana
gptkb:Indianapolis,_Indiana |
| gptkbp:consequences |
Strengthened judicial review
|
| gptkbp:context |
Post-Civil War America
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_Salmon_P._Chase
gptkb:Lambdin_Milligan gptkb:legal_case Civilian 5 votes for, 4 against |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
April 3, 1866 |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
April 3, 1866
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
Examined in the context of American history
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
gptkb:Reconstruction_Era
Post-Civil War America Suspension of habeas corpus |
| gptkbp:historical_event |
Civil War era tensions
|
| gptkbp:historical_impact |
Influenced future military trials
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Influenced future military tribunal cases
Set limits on military authority |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Ex parte Milligan
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Civilian rights in military contexts
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
Constitutional law principles
Civil War context |
| gptkbp:is_affected_by |
Post-Civil War legal framework
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
Subsequent Supreme Court cases
Frequently cited in legal discussions 71 U. S. 2 (1866) |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Lambdin_Milligan
|
| gptkbp:judges |
Justices who supported the ruling
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:battle
Judicial review of executive power Review of military authority Established precedent for judicial review of military actions |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:U._S._Constitution
Due process of law Strict interpretation of the Constitution Strengthened the role of the judiciary Constitutional protections during war Constitutionality of military tribunals Limited military jurisdiction over civilians Military trials violate constitutional rights Supreme Court's authority over military decisions Strengthened judicial oversight of military actions Civilians cannot be tried by military tribunals Reaffirmed the importance of civilian courts |
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Military_Commissions_Act_of_2006
gptkb:Habeas_Corpus_Act |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:Boumediene_v._Bush
gptkb:Hamdi_v._Rumsfeld gptkb:Korematsu_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:outcome |
gptkb:Justice_David_Davis
5-4 ruling Unanimous decision Key case in American legal history. Analyzed for its implications on civil rights Victory for civil liberties advocates Court ruled military tribunals unconstitutional Established limits on military jurisdiction. Example of judicial checks on military power Foundation for civil rights jurisprudence Influenced public perception of military authority Majority opinion emphasized civil rights Military tribunals cannot try civilians Milligan was released from military custody Reaffirmed civilian courts' jurisdiction Reinforced the importance of civil liberties Reinstatement of Milligan's rights Declared military trials unconstitutional for civilians Military tribunals are unconstitutional for civilians |
| gptkbp:precedent |
Established limits on executive power
Civilian rights in military contexts Limited military jurisdiction over civilians Subsequent cases regarding military jurisdiction |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_F._Miller
gptkb:Justice_David_Davis National security concerns No dissenting opinions Justices who opposed the ruling Civilian rights and due process |
| gptkbp:related_concept |
Martial law
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:war
Civil liberties Suspension of habeas corpus |
| gptkbp:significance |
Set precedent for civil liberties during wartime
Reinforced civil liberties during wartime |