Statements (97)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Often studied in law schools.
Implications for future legislation. Relevant to discussions on civil rights. Analysis of the case outcome. Details of the case analysis. Summary of the case analysis. |
| gptkbp:case_arguments_details |
Details of the case arguments.
|
| gptkbp:case_arguments_summary |
Summary of the case arguments.
|
| gptkbp:case_details_summary |
Summary of the case details.
|
| gptkbp:case_impact_details |
Details of the case's impact.
|
| gptkbp:case_impact_summary |
Summary of the case's impact.
|
| gptkbp:case_legacy_details |
Details of the case's legacy.
|
| gptkbp:case_legacy_summary |
Summary of the case's legacy.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
No. 1.
Involved a challenge to a specific law. Part of a series of cases on loyalty oaths. Garland challenged the loyalty oath required for attorneys. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Unanimous decision.
Summary of the case outcome details. Affected the rights of former Confederates. Details of Garland's reinstatement. Details of the court's decision. Garland was allowed to practice law. Majority opinion by Justice Joseph P. Bradley. Majority opinion emphasized individual rights. Ruling against the loyalty oath. |
| gptkbp:case_repercussions |
Repercussions for future legal cases.
|
| gptkbp:case_repercussions_details |
Details of the case's repercussions.
|
| gptkbp:case_repercussions_summary |
Summary of the case's repercussions.
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Summary of the case's significance.
Details of the case's significance. Significant for understanding loyalty in law. |
| gptkbp:case_study_details |
Details of the case study.
|
| gptkbp:case_study_details_summary |
Summary of the case study details.
|
| gptkbp:case_study_summary |
Summary of the case study.
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil rights case.
Arguments presented by both sides. |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
Supreme Court justices at the time. |
| gptkbp:court_composition_details |
Details of the court's composition.
|
| gptkbp:court_composition_summary |
Summary of the court's composition.
|
| gptkbp:court_decision_summary |
Summary of the court's decision.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
December 15, 1867 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
Dissent argued for national loyalty.
Dissent by Justice Samuel F. Miller. |
| gptkbp:doctrine |
Doctrine of unconstitutional conditions.
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Post-Civil War Reconstruction era.
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Highlighted issues of loyalty and citizenship.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Ex parte Garland
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future loyalty oath legislation.
Influenced post-Civil War legal landscape. |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Garland
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
71 U. S. 333
|
| gptkbp:judicial_impact_details |
Details of the judicial impact.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_impact_summary |
Summary of the judicial impact.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_outcome_details |
Detailed analysis of the ruling.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_outcome_details_summary |
Summary of the judicial outcome details.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_outcome_summary |
Summary of the judicial outcome.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_reasoning_details |
Details of the judicial reasoning.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_reasoning_summary |
Summary of the judicial reasoning.
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Reviewed by the Supreme Court.
Details of the judicial review process. Summary of the judicial review details. Summary of the judicial review. Based on constitutional protections. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
Federal jurisdiction.
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Legacy in American legal history.
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Summary of the legal context.
Context of Reconstruction policies. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Details of the legal framework.
Summary of the legal framework. Influenced future Supreme Court rulings. Declared the loyalty oath invalid. Part of the legal framework post-Civil War. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Constitutionality of a loyalty oath
|
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Resulted in a landmark ruling.
Implications for civil rights. Reinstatement of Garland's law license. Summary of the legal outcome implications. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Protection against ex post facto laws.
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Analyzed under the 14th Amendment.
Represented by attorney John A. Bingham. |
| gptkbp:legislation |
Loyalty Oath Act.
|
| gptkbp:modern_relevance |
Important for civil liberties.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The Supreme Court ruled the loyalty oath unconstitutional.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set a standard for future cases.
Details of the legal precedent set. Subsequent cases involving loyalty oaths. Summary of the legal precedent set. Established limits on government loyalty requirements. |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Cummings_v._Missouri
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Set a precedent regarding loyalty oaths.
Significant for civil liberties protections. |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Klein
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
7
|