Triple

T8387179
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Boumediene v. Bush E197844 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Boumediene v. Bush E197844 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Boumediene v. Bush | Statement: [Boumediene v. Bush, fullName, Boumediene v. Bush]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Boumediene v. Bush
Context triple: [Boumediene v. Bush, fullName, Boumediene v. Bush]
  • A. Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
    Hamdi v. Rumsfeld is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case that held American citizens designated as enemy combatants have the right to challenge their detention before a neutral decision-maker.
  • B. U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush chosen
    Boumediene v. Bush is a landmark 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held foreign detainees at Guantánamo Bay have a constitutional right to seek habeas corpus review in federal courts.
  • C. Van Orden v. Perry
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • D. Garcetti v. Ceballos
    Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
  • E. Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia is a 2004 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court limited judicial intrusion into the executive branch’s internal deliberations, particularly regarding Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy task force records.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ca82f749388190bffbea6dfb509016 completed March 30, 2026, 2:04 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69cb81076eac8190893813628cacc1aa completed March 31, 2026, 8:08 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69cde83aac448190b74f65507170a8f7 completed April 2, 2026, 3:53 a.m.
Created at: March 30, 2026, 6:03 p.m.