Dissent in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
GPTKB entity
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
States' rights
Medical decision-making Women's autonomy |
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
June 24, 2022
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Cultural_impact
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor gptkb:Public_opinion gptkb:Justice_Stephen_Breyer Social justice Access to healthcare Civic engagement Ethical considerations Gender equality Constitutional rights Legal precedent Public health concerns Women’s health Rights of marginalized groups Role of the judiciary Judicial integrity Legal ramifications Social implications Impact on future cases Judicial activism concerns Call for respect of precedent Future legal challenges Legal uncertainty Long-term implications Protection of reproductive rights |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Dissent in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Overturning Roe v. Wade
|
| gptkbp:key_issues |
Abortion rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
gptkb:Right_to_privacy
Precedent |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Planned_Parenthood_v._Casey |
| gptkbp:significance |
Constitutional interpretation
|
| gptkbp:was_a_response_to |
Legislative changes
Political debates Public protests |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|