Statements (62)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
November 29, 2011
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
analyzed by legal scholars
criticized by civil rights advocates impacts law enforcement training relevant to discussions on privacy rights influenced legislative discussions on police powers |
| gptkbp:case_educational_use |
used in law school curricula
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_scholarship |
analyzed in legal journals
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
appealed from lower court
available in legal databases summarized in legal reviews 10-5883 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
affirmed lower court ruling
affects future Fourth Amendment cases decision favored law enforcement evidence obtained without a warrant was allowed majority opinion supported by five justices |
| gptkbp:case_public_policy |
influenced public policy on law enforcement practices
|
| gptkbp:case_related_litigation |
inspired similar cases in lower courts
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for civil liberties
part of a series of Fourth Amendment cases |
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:legal_case
debated legality of evidence collection |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 25, 2012 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor
dissent raised concerns about civil rights |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Davis v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
law enforcement practices
influenced future rulings on evidence |
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
Davis and United States
|
| gptkbp:involves |
police conduct
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
564 U. S. 229
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Supreme Court review
reviewed by the Supreme Court |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
shaped judicial interpretations of the Fourth Amendment
part of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
sparked debates on police authority |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
upheld constitutional protections
upheld evidence collection |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
good faith exception
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
focused on warrantless searches
attorneys for Davis attorneys for United States |
| gptkbp:legislation |
exclusionary rule
|
| gptkbp:material |
involved a traffic stop
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
covered extensively in legal media
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
evidence was admissible
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Illinois_v._Krull
subsequent cases regarding warrantless searches established guidelines for police searches |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
mixed public opinion
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
search and seizure laws
|
| gptkbp:significance |
clarified the application of the exclusionary rule
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:John_W._Davis
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|