Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
gptkb:United_States_government
gptkb:Walter_Jones |
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Analyzed in law schools
Still relevant in contemporary legal discussions Implications for law enforcement practices Cleveland's defense attorney Used as a case study in legal education |
| gptkbp:case_number |
Appealed from lower court
Documented in legal archives Summarized in legal textbooks No. 45 |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Reversed lower court decision
Set precedent for future cases Majority opinion emphasized privacy rights Significant for civil liberties Emphasized the need for warrants Influenced public perception of law enforcement. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Strengthened individual rights
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 1, 1946 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Jackson
Dissent argued for law enforcement interests |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
No. 45
|
| gptkbp:duration |
Argued in 1945, decided in 1946
|
| gptkbp:election |
5-4 decision
|
| gptkbp:historical_context |
Civil rights movement era
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Cleveland v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Influenced future Supreme Court rulings
Influenced search and seizure laws |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
328 U. S. 329
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Reviewed by Supreme Court justices
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
federal jurisdiction
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Legacy in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Post-World War II legal landscape
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Part of constitutional law discussions
Influenced judicial attitudes towards privacy rights |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
Ongoing discussions about privacy vs. security |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Exclusionary rule
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court ruled in favor of Cleveland
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Cited in numerous legal opinions
subsequent Fourth Amendment cases |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter
|
| gptkbp:public_reaction |
Significant media coverage
|
| gptkbp:publications |
Numerous articles published
|
| gptkbp:reform |
Contributed to legal reforms in search and seizure
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Mapp_v._Ohio
|
| gptkbp:related_statute |
gptkb:Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation_Act
|
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified warrant requirements
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|