City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)

GPTKB entity

Statements (38)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate 1997-02-19
gptkbp:citation 521 U.S. 507
gptkbp:constitution gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment
gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkbp:date 1997-06-25
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:decision majority opinion
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:fullName City of Boerne, Petitioner v. Patrick F. Flores, Archbishop of San Antonio, and United States
gptkbp:heldBy RFRA is unconstitutional as applied to the states
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)
gptkbp:impact limited the scope of federal laws protecting religious exercise against state and local governments
gptkbp:legalIssue constitutionality of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) as applied to the states
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkbp:pages 507
gptkbp:petitioner gptkb:City_of_Boerne,_Texas
gptkbp:predecessor limiting Congress's enforcement powers under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment
gptkbp:relatedLegislation gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
gptkbp:reporter gptkb:U.S.
gptkbp:response gptkb:Archbishop_Patrick_F._Flores
gptkbp:subject federalism
religious freedom
separation of powers
gptkbp:volume 521
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:RFRA
gptkbp:bfsLayer 6