Citizens United decision

GPTKB entity

Statements (51)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf legal case
gptkbp:affiliatedWith gptkb:League_of_Women_Voters
gptkb:American_Civil_Liberties_Union
gptkb:Citizens_for_Responsibility_and_Ethics_in_Washington
gptkb:Sunlight_Foundation
gptkb:Brennan_Center_for_Justice
gptkb:Center_for_Responsive_Politics
MoveOn.org
Common Cause
Public Citizen
Campaign Legal Center
Democracy 21
gptkbp:caseTypes 08-205
gptkbp:criticism Critics argue it undermines democracy
gptkbp:date January 21, 2010
gptkbp:decidedBy gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:encouragesParticipationIn Debated impact on voter turnout
gptkbp:hasPoliticalParty Shifted power dynamics
gptkbp:historical_analysis Extensive legal scholarship
gptkbp:homeMediaRelease Increased political advertising
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Citizens United decision
gptkbp:impact Increased influence of money in politics
Increased political spending by corporations
Challenged by increased spending
gptkbp:influencedBy 2008 presidential election
gptkbp:influenceOn Allowed more political activity
gptkbp:internationalClassification Other countries examining campaign finance laws
gptkbp:judges gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
Stephen Breyer
Judicial activism
gptkbp:legalStatus gptkb:First_Amendment
Constitutional law
Campaign finance
Expanded free speech rights for corporations
gptkbp:nonPatentCitation Influenced state-level campaign finance laws
Increased spending in judicial races
Significant impact on federal elections
gptkbp:notableEvent DISCLOSE Act
Campaign finance reform proposals
gptkbp:outcome Struck down limits on independent expenditures
gptkbp:politicalParty gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkbp:precedent gptkb:First_National_Bank_of_Boston_v._Bellotti
gptkbp:publicAccess Controversial and polarizing
Ongoing discussions about campaign finance
gptkbp:relatedPatent gptkb:Buckley_v._Valeo
gptkb:McCutcheon_v._FEC
gptkbp:relatedTo Super PACs
Political_Action_Committees
gptkbp:supports Supporters argue it protects free speech