Statements (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:associatedWith |
Election law
Political lobbying Campaign finance reform Campaign strategies Super PACs Political reform movements Political_Action_Committees_(PACs) |
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
13-402
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
Subsequent campaign finance cases
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Potential for increased political spending
|
| gptkbp:court |
Constitutional protection of political spending
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
April 2, 2014 |
| gptkbp:discusses |
Legal opinions
Political debates Media analysis Public policy discussions Legal scholarship Political science literature |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
October 8, 2013
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
McCutcheon v. FEC
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Increased individual contribution limits
|
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
gptkb:Buckley_v._Valeo
Grassroots movements Public opinion on campaign finance Activist_groups Judicial_interpretations_of_the_First_Amendment |
| gptkbp:judges |
Justice Stephen Breyer
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Campaign finance limits
Expanded interpretation of free speech rights U.S._campaign_finance_law Invalidated_certain_federal_contribution_limits |
| gptkbp:mediaCoverage |
Extensive coverage
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Struck down aggregate contribution limits
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Citizens_United_v._FEC
|
| gptkbp:publicAccess |
Controversial decision
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
Constitutional law
Free speech Election integrity Election Campaigns Political contributions Political accountability Political transparency Political ethics Electoral politics Voter influence Political donations regulation First_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
gptkb:Federal_Election_Commission
|
| gptkbp:signatories |
gptkb:Shaun_McCutcheon
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Influence on political donations
|
| gptkbp:voterTurnout |
5-4
|