|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:law
|
|
gptkbp:alsoKnownAs
|
gptkb:Chevron_deference
|
|
gptkbp:appliesTo
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_administrative_law
Statute is ambiguous and agency interpretation is reasonable
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
Thousands of federal court decisions
|
|
gptkbp:criticizedFor
|
Granting too much power to administrative agencies
|
|
gptkbp:establishedBy
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
|
gptkbp:firstReleased
|
1984
|
|
gptkbp:holdsThat
|
Courts should defer to administrative agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Chevron doctrine
|
|
gptkbp:influencedBy
|
Judicial review principles
|
|
gptkbp:namedAfter
|
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:originatedIn
|
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:potentiallyOverruledBy
|
gptkb:Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v._Raimondo
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Skidmore_deference
gptkb:Administrative_Procedure_Act
Judicial deference
|
|
gptkbp:significantCase
|
gptkb:Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v._Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
Ongoing legal and political debate
|
|
gptkbp:twoStepTest
|
Step One: Has Congress spoken directly to the precise question at issue?
Step Two: If not, is the agency's interpretation reasonable?
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Chevron_deference
gptkb:Chevron_deference_doctrine
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|