gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:advocacy
|
gptkb:Human_Rights_Campaign
|
gptkbp:argued_on
|
gptkb:Ninth_Circuit_Court_of_Appeals
|
gptkbp:associated_with
|
gptkb:Proposition_8_campaign
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
gptkb:2009
analyzed by legal scholars
widely studied in law schools
broader civil rights issues
|
gptkbp:case_number
|
09-17241
extensive legal briefs
|
gptkbp:case_outcome
|
affirmed lower court ruling
advocacy for LGBTQ rights
opposition from conservative groups
debated in public forums
dismissed appeal
changed public policy
celebrations among supporters
influenced state laws across the country
remains a landmark decision.
|
gptkbp:case_significance
|
pivotal in marriage equality movement
|
gptkbp:consequences
|
federal recognition of same-sex marriages
|
gptkbp:court
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
gptkbp:court's_ruling_impact
|
increased visibility for LGBTQ issues
|
gptkbp:decided_by
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:duration
|
several years
highly complex legal arguments
|
gptkbp:followed_by
|
legalization of same-sex marriage in California
|
gptkbp:has_meetings
|
held prior to ruling
|
gptkbp:historical_context
|
gptkb:2008_California_ballot_measure
|
gptkbp:historical_period
|
detailed and public
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
California Proposition 8 case
|
gptkbp:impact
|
gptkb:LGBT_rights_movement
|
gptkbp:influenced_by
|
gptkb:civil_rights_movements
|
gptkbp:initiated_by
|
two same-sex couples
|
gptkbp:involved_legal_experts
|
constitutional law scholars
|
gptkbp:involved_parties
|
gptkb:State_of_California
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:same-sex_marriage
|
gptkbp:is_a_basis_for
|
Equal Protection Clause
|
gptkbp:is_challenged_by
|
gptkb:Equality_California
|
gptkbp:judges
|
Judges Reinhardt, Hawkins, and Berzon
|
gptkbp:judgment_issued_on
|
June 26, 2013
|
gptkbp:judicial_review
|
constitutional challenge
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
protection of marriage
constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans
|
gptkbp:legal_outcome
|
same-sex marriage legalized
|
gptkbp:legal_principle
|
litigation against state officials
|
gptkbp:legal_representation
|
gptkb:American_Foundation_for_Equal_Rights
California officials
|
gptkbp:legislation
|
California Family Code
|
gptkbp:media_coverage
|
extensive
|
gptkbp:outcome
|
overturned Proposition 8
national implications for marriage equality
|
gptkbp:preceded_by
|
gptkb:Proposition_22
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
gptkb:Obergefell_v._Hodges
influenced future cases
|
gptkbp:public_perception
|
shifted towards support for same-sex marriage
|
gptkbp:public_reaction
|
mixed reactions
|
gptkbp:related_cases
|
gptkb:Hollingsworth_v._Perry
|
gptkbp:related_event
|
California Supreme Court ruling
|
gptkbp:related_to
|
gptkb:California_Proposition_8
civil unions
|
gptkbp:significance
|
landmark ruling
|
gptkbp:year
|
gptkb:2013
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:David_Boies
gptkb:The_National_Center_for_Lesbian_Rights
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
5
|