Statements (60)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:referendum
|
| gptkbp:affects |
app-based transportation and delivery drivers
|
| gptkbp:allows |
companies to classify drivers as independent contractors
|
| gptkbp:depicted_in |
a model for other states
a precedent for other states a victory for gig companies |
| gptkbp:has_been_scrutinized_by |
gptkb:Journalist
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
future ballot measures
worker classification laws future labor policies |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Proposition 22
|
| gptkbp:impact |
classification of gig workers
|
| gptkbp:includes_provisions_for |
healthcare subsidies
vehicle insurance |
| gptkbp:introduced_in |
California voters
|
| gptkbp:is_a_subject_of |
gptkb:media_coverage
public debate |
| gptkbp:is_analyzed_in |
policy experts
its economic effects |
| gptkbp:is_associated_with |
worker rights issues
economic freedom arguments |
| gptkbp:is_challenged_by |
in court
advocacy groups |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
national discussions on labor laws
|
| gptkbp:is_considered |
a significant change in labor law
|
| gptkbp:is_debated_in |
state legislatures
|
| gptkbp:is_discussed_in |
gptkb:academic_research
political analysts |
| gptkbp:is_evaluated_by |
think tanks
|
| gptkbp:is_funded_by |
$200 million in advertising
|
| gptkbp:is_linked_to |
economic impacts on drivers
|
| gptkbp:is_opposed_by |
gptkb:labor_unions
gptkb:California_Democratic_Party |
| gptkbp:is_part_of |
California's legislative history
the broader gig economy discussion the gig economy debate |
| gptkbp:is_referenced_in |
gptkb:legal_case
court rulings |
| gptkbp:is_related_to |
worker protections
gig economy companies |
| gptkbp:is_subject_to |
legal scrutiny
|
| gptkbp:is_supported_by |
gptkb:Lyft
gptkb:Uber |
| gptkbp:key_issues |
California elections
|
| gptkbp:passes_through |
November 2020
|
| gptkbp:purpose |
exempt app-based transportation and delivery companies from providing employee benefits
|
| gptkbp:requires |
companies to provide certain benefits to drivers
|
| gptkbp:result |
passed
|
| gptkbp:translated_into |
controversial
|
| gptkbp:type_of |
gptkb:referendum
|
| gptkbp:voter_turnout |
approximately 58%
|
| gptkbp:was_a_factor_in |
California's political landscape
California's labor market |
| gptkbp:was_a_response_to |
gptkb:AB_5_legislation
|
| gptkbp:was_supported_by |
gptkb:Lyft
gptkb:Uber |
| gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2020
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:California_Supreme_Court
gptkb:California_Proposition_8 |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
5
|