Burwell v. Hobby Lobby

GPTKB entity

Statements (34)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:arguedDate March 25, 2014
gptkbp:citation 573 U.S. 682
gptkbp:country gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date June 30, 2014
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
Stephen Breyer (in part)
Elena Kagan (in part)
gptkbp:docketNumber 13-354
gptkbp:fullName gptkb:Burwell_v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
gptkbp:heldBy Closely held for-profit corporations can be exempt from regulations that violate their religious beliefs under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
gptkbp:historicalPeriod 10th Circuit Court of Appeals decision
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Burwell v. Hobby Lobby
gptkbp:impact Affected application of contraceptive mandate for certain employers
gptkbp:judge gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:legalIssue gptkb:Affordable_Care_Act_contraceptive_mandate
gptkb:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
Stephen Breyer (in part)
Elena Kagan (in part)
gptkbp:petitioner Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services
gptkbp:relatedTo gptkb:Conestoga_Wood_Specialties_Corp._v._Burwell
gptkbp:response gptkb:Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.
gptkbp:subject religious liberty
contraceptive coverage
gptkbp:subsequentHistory Remanded to lower courts
gptkbp:website https://www.oyez.org/cases/2013/13-354
gptkbp:bfsParent gptkb:Sylvia_Burwell,_Secretary_of_Health_and_Human_Services,_et_al._v._Hobby_Lobby_Stores,_Inc.,_et_al.
gptkbp:bfsLayer 5