Statements (56)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
government cannot deny trademarks based on content
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
gptkb:cultural_expression
free speech jurisprudence commercial speech protections First Amendment and trademarks |
| gptkbp:case_implications_for |
branding and marketing
|
| gptkbp:case_implications_for_artists |
trademark rights
|
| gptkbp:case_implications_for_businesses |
trademark registration process
|
| gptkbp:case_implications_for_entrepreneurs |
branding strategies
|
| gptkbp:case_implications_for_free_speech |
commercial entities
|
| gptkbp:case_implications_for_law |
intellectual property rights
|
| gptkbp:case_implications_for_society |
cultural norms
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
17-1109
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
trademark granted
trademark law evolution trademark application approvals |
| gptkbp:case_relevance_to |
artistic expression
|
| gptkbp:case_significance |
affects future trademark applications
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
November 15, 2018
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
June 24, 2019
unanimous opinion |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Alito
concerns about moral standards |
| gptkbp:election |
6-3
|
| gptkbp:has_implications_for |
free expression in commerce
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Brunetti v. Iancu
|
| gptkbp:impact |
trademark registration policies
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:USPTO
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
588 U. S. 404 (2019)
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
constitutional review
content-based restrictions |
| gptkbp:legal_context |
intellectual property law
government speech doctrine |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Lanham Act provisions
trademark office practices |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
First Amendment rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
viewpoint discrimination is unconstitutional
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
gptkb:Paul_Clement
First Amendment implications |
| gptkbp:legislation |
trademark law
|
| gptkbp:material |
Brunetti's trademark application
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
struck down a provision of the Lanham Act
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Matal_v._Tam
free speech cases future trademark disputes trademarks cannot be denied based on immorality |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Kagan
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Matal_v._Tam
|
| gptkbp:responds_to |
Andrei Iancu
|
| gptkbp:signatories |
Erik Brunetti
|
| gptkbp:significance |
affirms free speech protections
|
| gptkbp:trademark |
FUCT
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:In_re_Tam
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|