Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U.S. 249 (1953)

GPTKB entity

Predicate	Object
gptkbp:instanceOf	gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
gptkbp:citation	346 U.S. 249
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Felix_Frankfurter gptkb:Justice_Hugo_Black
gptkbp:constitution	gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkbp:country	gptkb:United_States
gptkbp:date	1953
gptkbp:decidedBy	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Harold_Hitz_Burton gptkb:Justice_Robert_H._Jackson gptkb:Justice_Stanley_Forman_Reed
gptkbp:fullName	gptkb:Barrows_v._Jackson
gptkbp:heldBy	A person may raise the constitutional rights of another as a defense when enforcement of a law or contract would violate those rights.
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label	Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U.S. 249 (1953)
gptkbp:judge	gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy	gptkb:Justice_Tom_C._Clark
gptkbp:numberOfIssues	Whether a white property owner could be held liable for damages for selling property to a Black person in violation of a racially restrictive covenant.
gptkbp:principle	third-party standing
gptkbp:relatedTo	gptkb:Shelley_v._Kraemer
gptkbp:result	Judgment reversed
gptkbp:subject	racially restrictive covenants
gptkbp:bfsParent	gptkb:Barrows_v._Jackson
gptkbp:bfsLayer	7