|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
November 17, 1971
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
405 U.S. 438
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Douglas
gptkb:Marshall
White
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
March 22, 1972
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:defendant
|
gptkb:Thomas_Eisenstadt
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:meat
gptkb:Rehnquist
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
70-17
|
|
gptkbp:fullName
|
William Baird v. Thomas Eisenstadt, Sheriff of Suffolk County
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Unmarried persons have the same right to possess contraception as married persons.
|
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:Douglas
gptkb:meat
gptkb:Blackmun
gptkb:Powell
gptkb:Marshall
Stewart
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Massachusetts
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:William_J._Brennan,_Jr.
|
|
gptkbp:plaintiff
|
gptkb:William_Baird
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
Equal protection under the law
Right to privacy in contraception decisions
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Eisenstadt_v._Baird
gptkb:Griswold_v._Connecticut
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
equal protection
right to privacy
contraception
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Comstock_Act
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Baird v. Eisenstadt
|