Statements (19)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:citation |
407 U.S. 143
|
| gptkbp:courtOpinion |
The Court held that the Fourth Amendment allows a police officer to approach and search a person based on a tip from an informant.
|
| gptkbp:date |
1972
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
gptkb:Thurgood_Marshall
gptkb:William_O._Douglas |
| gptkbp:fullName |
gptkb:Adams_v._Williams,_407_U.S._143_(1972)
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
A police officer may conduct a stop and frisk based on information supplied by another person, not just personal observation.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Adams v. Williams
|
| gptkbp:legalSubject |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
stop and frisk |
| gptkbp:location |
gptkb:Bridgeport,_Connecticut
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
|
| gptkbp:petitioner |
gptkb:Adams
|
| gptkbp:predecessor |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio
|
| gptkbp:response |
gptkb:Williams
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Terry_v._Ohio,_392_U.S._1_(1968)
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|