|
gptkb:Hernandez_v._Texas
|
Mexican Americans constitute a distinct class entitled to protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
gptkb:Federal_Baseball_Club_of_Baltimore,_Inc._v._National_League_of_Professional_Baseball_Clubs_et_al.
|
unanimous decision
|
|
gptkb:O'Brien_v._United_States
|
The law prohibiting destruction of draft cards did not violate the First Amendment.
|
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Riverside_Bayview_Homes
|
unanimous
|
|
gptkb:Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire
|
Certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech are not protected by the First Amendment.
|
|
gptkb:J.I._Case_Co._v._Borak_(1964)
|
The Court held that private parties may sue to enforce Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
gptkb:Red_Lion_v._FCC
|
unanimous
|
|
gptkb:Adams_v._Williams
|
The Court held that the Fourth Amendment allows a police officer to approach and search a person based on a tip from an informant.
|
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Yellow_Cab_Company
|
The Court held that a combination among cab companies to restrain interstate commerce violated the Sherman Act.
|
|
gptkb:Swift_&_Company_et_al._v._United_States
|
unanimous decision
|
|
gptkb:Diamond,_Commissioner_of_Patents_and_Trademarks_v._Chakrabarty
|
5-4 decision
|
|
gptkb:Bailey_v._Drexel_Furniture_Co.
|
8-1 decision
|
|
gptkb:United_States_v._Pink
|
The President has the power to make executive agreements with foreign nations that are binding on the states.
|
|
gptkb:Weeks_v._United_States
|
unanimous decision
|