Statements (19)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
| gptkbp:arguedDate |
October 31, 2012
|
| gptkbp:citation |
569 U.S. 1
|
| gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy |
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Elena_Kagan |
| gptkbp:country |
gptkb:United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
March 26, 2013
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy |
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
| gptkbp:docketNumber |
11-564
|
| gptkbp:heldBy |
The use of a drug-sniffing dog on a homeowner's porch to investigate the contents of the home is a 'search' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
569 U.S. 278
|
| gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy |
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
|
| gptkbp:officialName |
gptkb:Florida_v._Jardines
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Illinois_v._Caballes
gptkb:Kyllo_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:subject |
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Bowman_v._Monsanto_Co.
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|