gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
April 25, 2012
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:567_U.S._460
|
gptkbp:concurringInPartBy
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
gptkb:Elena_Kagan
gptkb:Samuel_Alito
|
gptkbp:date
|
June 25, 2012
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
11-182
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Most provisions of Arizona SB 1070 are preempted by federal law, except for Section 2(B).
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
567 U.S. 460
|
gptkbp:joinedBy
|
gptkb:John_Roberts
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:Sonia_Sotomayor
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
gptkbp:legalCitation
|
gptkb:Arizona_v._United_States,_567_U.S._460_(2012)
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Arizona_v._United_States
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Arizona
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
federal supremacy in immigration enforcement
|
gptkbp:relatedLegislation
|
gptkb:Arizona_SB_1070
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Arizona_SB_1070
immigration law
federal preemption
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Miller_v._Alabama
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|