|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:Gonzales_v._Raich,_546_U.S._21_(2005)
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
2005-06-06
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
03-1454
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
Congress may criminalize the production and use of homegrown cannabis even if states approve its use for medicinal purposes.
|
|
gptkbp:historicalPeriod
|
gptkb:Raich_v._Ashcroft,_352_F.3d_1222_(9th_Cir._2003)
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
546 U.S. 21
|
|
gptkbp:legalIssue
|
gptkb:Controlled_Substances_Act
Commerce Clause
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkb:David_Souter
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Gonzales_v._Raich
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
21
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Alberto_R._Gonzales,_Attorney_General,_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Angel_McClary_Raich_et_al.
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Federalism
Medical marijuana
Interstate commerce
|
|
gptkbp:subsequentHistory
|
On remand, 500 F.3d 850 (9th Cir. 2007)
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
546
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:IBP,_Inc._(2001)
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|