|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
January 13, 1999
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:527_U.S._581
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
May 17, 1999
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:William_Rehnquist_Court
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
98-97
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
California's law limiting welfare benefits for new residents violated the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
527 U.S. 581
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Saenz_v._Roe
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
581
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:Saenz
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
right to travel
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:Roe
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
527
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Olmstead_v._L.C.
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
6
|