|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1999-01-13
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:526_U.S._629
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Anthony_Kennedy
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1999-05-17
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Sandra_Day_O'Connor
gptkb:William_Rehnquist
gptkb:Clarence_Thomas
|
|
gptkbp:docketNumber
|
98-97
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
California's law limiting welfare benefits for new residents violates the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
|
|
gptkbp:historicalPeriod
|
Roe v. Anderson, 134 F.3d 1400 (9th Cir. 1998)
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
526 U.S. 629
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Saenz_v._Roe
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
629
|
|
gptkbp:relatedLegislation
|
California Welfare Reform Act
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
gptkb:Privileges_or_Immunities_Clause
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:subsequentHistory
|
nan
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
526
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Davis_v._Monroe_County_Board_of_Education
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|