Statements (73)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
1983-03-01
|
| gptkbp:argument_duration |
1 hour.
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Often studied in law schools.
Analyzed under constitutional scrutiny. Implications for future self-incrimination cases. Remains relevant in legal discussions. |
| gptkbp:case_documentation_details |
Details are part of legal history.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_analysis_details |
Details analyzed by legal experts.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_contextualization |
Contextualized in legal discussions.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_documentation |
Documented in legal literature.
|
| gptkbp:case_legal_relevance |
Remains relevant in legal studies.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:United_States_v._Balsys
Documented in legal archives. No. 82-1001 Appealed from lower court ruling. Summarized in legal reviews. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Influenced future self-incrimination jurisprudence.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part. Detailed in legal textbooks. Details of the decision are widely studied. Impacts legal interpretations. Limited the scope of Fifth Amendment protections. Majority opinion emphasized government interests. Ruling affected self-incrimination defenses. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Significant for legal precedents.
Key case in constitutional law. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
Impact on legal standards.
Influenced self-incrimination cases. |
| gptkbp:court |
Rehnquist Court.
|
| gptkbp:court_analysis |
Analyzed by legal scholars.
|
| gptkbp:court_arguments |
Presented arguments for both sides.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_William_J._Brennan_Jr.
Dissent argued for individual rights. Argued for broader interpretation of self-incrimination. |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1983-06-15
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
462 U. S. 416
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
United States, Balsys
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
gptkb:462_U._S._416
Frequently referenced in legal discussions. Cited in numerous self-incrimination cases. |
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Reviewed lower court's interpretation.
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Contextualized within constitutional law.
Contextualized in legal frameworks. Federal criminal law. |
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
gptkb:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit
Part of constitutional law framework. Part of the legal framework. Judicial outcome influenced legal standards. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Established legal principles.
Generated debate on individual rights. Generated legal debate. Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination |
| gptkbp:legal_outcome |
Narrowed the application of the Fifth Amendment.
Outcomes influenced legal practices. |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Self-incrimination must be invoked.
|
| gptkbp:legal_reference |
Referenced in legal opinions.
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Analyzed for its legal implications.
Examined the balance between individual rights and government interests. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
The court ruled against Balsys.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Set a precedent for future cases.
Established limits on self-incrimination. Fifth Amendment interpretation |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist
5-4. |
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Kastigar_v._United_States
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Clarified the scope of the Fifth Amendment.
Important for understanding Fifth Amendment rights. |
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:City_of_Akron_v._Akron_Center_for_Reproductive_Health
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
6
|