|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
January 18–23, 1837
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1837
February 14, 1837
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Smith_Thompson
gptkb:Joseph_Story
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The charter of the Charles River Bridge Company did not grant an exclusive right to the bridge, and the state could authorize construction of the Warren Bridge.
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
gptkb:Contract_Clause
corporate charters
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Massachusetts
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Roger_B._Taney
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Charles_River_Bridge_v._Warren_Bridge
|
|
gptkbp:party
|
gptkb:Charles_River_Bridge_Company
gptkb:Warren_Bridge_Company
|
|
gptkbp:Peters_Reports_citation
|
16 Pet. 539
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
interpretation of corporate charters
public interest vs. private contract rights
|
|
gptkbp:U.S._Reports_citation
|
41 U.S. 539
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
41
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Prigg_v._Pennsylvania
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
41 U.S. (16 Pet.) 539
|