|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Lawrence_v._Texas
gptkb:Obergefell_v._Hodges
gptkb:Eisenstadt_v._Baird
gptkb:402_U.S._1
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:Arthur_Goldberg
gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan_II
|
|
gptkbp:country
|
gptkb:United_States
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1965-06-07
|
|
gptkbp:decidedBy
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
A Connecticut law criminalizing the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
402 U.S. 1
|
|
gptkbp:legalSubject
|
right to privacy
contraception
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Griswold_v._Connecticut
|
|
gptkbp:relatedTo
|
gptkb:Due_Process_Clause
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
gptkb:Ninth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
402
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Swann_v._Charlotte-Mecklenburg_Board_of_Education
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|