|
gptkbp:instanceOf
|
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court_case
|
|
gptkbp:amendedBy
|
gptkb:Fourteenth_Amendment
gptkb:Fifth_Amendment
gptkb:First_Amendment
gptkb:Fourth_Amendment
gptkb:Ninth_Amendment
gptkb:Third_Amendment
|
|
gptkbp:arguedDate
|
1965-03-30
1965-03-29
|
|
gptkbp:citation
|
gptkb:380_U.S._460
|
|
gptkbp:concurringOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Arthur_Goldberg
gptkb:John_Marshall_Harlan_II
|
|
gptkbp:date
|
1965-06-07
|
|
gptkbp:dissentingOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
|
|
gptkbp:heldBy
|
The Constitution protects the right to privacy in marital relations.
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
380 U.S. 460
|
|
gptkbp:judge
|
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
|
gptkbp:location
|
gptkb:Washington,_D.C.
|
|
gptkbp:majorityOpinionBy
|
gptkb:Hugo_Black
gptkb:Byron_White
gptkb:William_J._Brennan_Jr.
gptkb:William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Tom_C._Clark
gptkb:Earl_Warren
gptkb:Potter_Stewart
|
|
gptkbp:officialName
|
gptkb:Griswold_v._Connecticut
|
|
gptkbp:pages
|
460
|
|
gptkbp:petitioner
|
gptkb:C._Lee_Buxton
gptkb:Estelle_Griswold
|
|
gptkbp:predecessor
|
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Lawrence_v._Texas
gptkb:Obergefell_v._Hodges
gptkb:Eisenstadt_v._Baird
|
|
gptkbp:principle
|
penumbras of the Bill of Rights
|
|
gptkbp:relatedConcept
|
unenumerated rights
substantive due process
marital privacy
|
|
gptkbp:reporter
|
gptkb:United_States_Reports
|
|
gptkbp:response
|
gptkb:State_of_Connecticut
|
|
gptkbp:stateLawChallenged
|
Connecticut law banning use of contraceptives
|
|
gptkbp:subject
|
right to privacy
contraception
|
|
gptkbp:volume
|
380
|
|
gptkbp:bfsParent
|
gptkb:Hanna_v._Plumer
|
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer
|
7
|