Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Avery v. Midland County | Statement: [Reynolds v. Sims decision, relatedCase, Avery v. Midland County]

Target entity: Avery v. Midland County
Context triple: [Reynolds v. Sims decision, relatedCase, Avery v. Midland County]

• A. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
  Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce was a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on corporate independent political expenditures under the First Amendment until it was later overturned by Citizens United.
• B. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• C. Corfield v. Coryell
  Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
• D. Branch v. Texas
  Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
• E. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine
  Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the burden-shifting framework in Title VII employment discrimination claims, particularly the employer’s burden of production versus the plaintiff’s burden of persuasion.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Avery v. Midland County
Triple: [Reynolds v. Sims decision, relatedCase, Avery v. Midland County]

Avery v. Midland County is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the "one person, one vote" principle to local government districts, requiring that they be apportioned on a population basis.

Target entity: Avery v. Midland County
Target entity description: Avery v. Midland County is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the "one person, one vote" principle to local government districts, requiring that they be apportioned on a population basis.

• A. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
  Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce was a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on corporate independent political expenditures under the First Amendment until it was later overturned by Citizens United.
• B. Ray v. Blair
  Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
• C. Corfield v. Coryell
  Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
• D. Branch v. Texas
  Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
• E. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine
  Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the burden-shifting framework in Title VII employment discrimination claims, particularly the employer’s burden of production versus the plaintiff’s burden of persuasion.
• F. None of above. chosen