Statements (28)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
increased challenges for public sector unions
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
5-4 ruling
|
| gptkbp:employees |
reduces financial support for unions
|
| gptkbp:future_plans |
set precedent for similar challenges
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Abood_established_in_1977
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
overturned Abood precedent
|
| gptkbp:impact |
affects union membership
redefined union funding mechanisms |
| gptkbp:influence |
affects labor relations policy
|
| gptkbp:internationalClassification |
mixed responses from labor groups
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan
Supreme_Court_decision |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
free speech rights
|
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
compelled speech
agency fees First_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
varied responses across states
Janus_v._AFSCME,_Council_31,_585_U.S._(2018) |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Abood_v._Detroit_Board_of_Education
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
polarized views on unions
|
| gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
debated its implications
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Janus_v._AFSCME
|
| gptkbp:significance |
changed public sector union funding rules
|
| gptkbp:tactics |
adapt to new legal landscape
|
| gptkbp:year |
2018
|